定语从句经典范例？

一、定语从句经典范例？

1

概念引入

欣赏含有定语从句的名言：

Laughter is the sun that drives winter from the human face.

笑是太阳，它从人们的脸上赶走冬天。

Don’t trust the first sign that you see.

不要相信你看见的第一个迹象。

All is not gold that glitters.

发光的未必都是金子。

Nothing is impossible to the man who has will.

世上无难事，只怕有心人。

God helps those who help themselves.

自助者天助。

2

用法讲解

一、定语从句的功用和结构

在复合句中，修饰某一名词或代词的从句叫做定语从句。被定语从句修饰的词叫做先行词，定语从句必须放在先行词之后。引导定语从句的关联词有关系代词和关系副词。

This is the present that he gave me for my birthday.

这是他给我的生日礼物。

Do you know everybody who came to the party?

你认识来宴会的每一位吗？

This is the place where Chairman Mao once lived.

这是毛主席曾经居住的地方。

二、各个关系代词和关系副词的具体用法

1. who 指人，在定语从句中作主语或宾语。

I prefer singers who can write their own lyrics.

我更喜欢能写自己歌词的歌唱家。

These are musicians who make us happy.

这些是能让我们高兴的音乐家。

People who eat a balanced diet are healthier.

平衡饮食的人是健康的。

2. whom指人，在定语从句中作宾语。

Do you know the young man (whom) we met at the gate？

你认识我们在门口遇到的那个年轻人吗？

Mr. Lee (whom) you want to see has come.

你想见的李先生已经来了。

3. whose 指人，在定语从句中作定语。

The girl whose mother is ill is staying at home today.

她妈妈病了的那个女孩今天呆在家。

I know the boy whose father is a professor.

我认识他的父亲是教授的那个男孩。

4. which指物，在定语从中作主语或宾语。

A dictionary is a book which gives the meaning of words.

字典是给单词释义的一本书。

Here is the book (which) the teacher mentioned yesterday.

这是老师昨天提到的那本书。

5. that多指物，有时也指人，在定语从句中作主语或宾语。

I prefer music that has great lyrics. 我喜欢具有优美歌词的音乐。

Carmen likes music that’s loud. Carmen喜欢大声的音乐。

I like music that I can dance to. 我喜欢能伴舞的音乐。

6. when 指时间，在定语从句中作状语。

I’ll never forget the time when we worked on the farm.

我从来不会忘记我们工作在农场的那个时光。

He arrived in Beijing on the day when I left.

在我离开的那天他到的北京。

7. where 指地点，在定语从句中作状语。

This is the house where we lived last year.

这是我们去年居住的那个房子。

The factory where his father works is in the east of the city.

他的父亲工作的工厂是在城市的东边。

三、关系代词和关系副词的功用

关系代词和关系副词用来引导定语从句，在先行词和定语从句之间起纽带作用，使二者联系起来。关系代词和关系副词又在定语从句中充当一个成分，关系代词可作主语、宾语或定语，关系副词可作状语。

1. 作主语：关系代词在定语从句中作主语时，从句的谓语动词的人称和数必须和先行词一致。

I don’t like people who talk much but do little.

我不喜欢说话多做事少的人。

The cars which are produced in Hubei Province sell very well.

在湖北省生产的汽车销量好。

2. 作宾语

She is the person that I met at the school gate yesterday.

她是我昨天在校门口遇到的那个人。

The book that my grandmother gave me is called The Great Escape.

我奶奶给我的那本书叫做《胜利大逃亡》。

3. 作定语：关系代词whose在定语从句中作定语。

What’s the name of the young man whose sister is a doctor?

他的妹妹是医生的那个年轻男士叫什么名字？

The girl whose father is a teacher studies very hard.

她的父亲是一位老师的那个女孩学习非常努力。

4. 作状语

I’ll never forget the day when I first came to Beijing.

我从来不会忘记我第一次来北京的那天。

This is the house where I was born.

这是我出生的那个房子。

四、具体使用时还要注意下列问题：

1. 只能使用that,不用which 的情况：

1）先行词被序数词或形容词最高级所修饰，或本身是序数词、形容词最高级时，只能用that，而不用which。

He was the first person that passed the exam. 他是第一个通过考试的人。

2）被修饰的先行词为all，any，much，many，everything，anything，none，the one等不定代词时，只能用that，而不用which。

Is there anything that you want to buy in the shop？在商店里你有什么东西要买吗？

3）先行词被the only，the very，the same，the last，little，few 等词修饰时，只能用that，而不用which。

This is the same bike that I lost. 这就是我丢的那辆自行车。

4）先行词里同时含有人或物时，只能用that， 而不用which.

I can remember well the persons and some pictures that I saw in the room.

我能清楚记得我在那个房间所见到的人和一些照片。

5）以who或which引导的特殊疑问句，为避免重复，只能用that.

Who is the girl that is crying？正在哭泣的那个女孩是谁？

6）主句是there be 结构，修饰主语的定语从句用that，而不用which.

There is a book on the desk that belongs to Tom. 桌子上那本书是汤姆的。

2. 只能用which，不用that的情况：

1）先行词为that，those时，用which，而不用that.

What’s that which is under the desk？在桌子底下的那些东西是什么？

2）关系代词前有介词时，一般用which，而不用that.

This is the room in which he lives. 这是他居住的房间。

3）引导非限制性定语从句，用which，而不用that.

Tom came back，which made us happy. 汤姆回来了，这使我们很高兴。

3. 关系代词 whom，which 在定语从句中作介词宾语时，可以和介词一起放在先行词与定语从句之间，有时为了关系紧凑也可以将 whom 或 which 放先行词后，而将介词置于定语从句的后面。

That was the room in which we had lived for ten years.

= That was the room which we had lived in for ten years.

那是我们居住了十年的房子。

二、医疗，智慧医疗是什么？

医疗是指为患者提供治疗、康复和预防疾病的健康服务。随着科技的发展，智慧医疗已成为医疗领域的重要发展方向。智慧医疗通过运用信息技术、人工智能、物联网等新技术，实现了医疗资源的共享和优化、医患沟通的便利化、医疗风险的降低等多方面的升级和改善。

智慧医疗不仅可以提高医疗服务的效率、质量和安全性，还可以促进医疗资源的合理配置、降低医疗费用、实现医疗健康与信息互通等。通过智慧医疗的发展，未来的医疗将更加便捷、高效和精准。

三、广告长文案经典范例？

1、找得到生活的人，在哪个城市都能找到家的感觉。

来源：支付宝的「十年生活账本」。

很多时候，不是找不到家的感觉，而是忘记了生活是什么样子。当你学会了如何去生活，那生活回馈于你，家的感觉。

2、注定要去的地方，不管多晚都有光。

来源：青岛啤酒《夜猫子的歌》MV

黑暗其实不可怕，可怕的是你在黑暗中失去了前行的方向。一旦你有了前行的方向，那就是一束光，会一直引领你一直往前行。

3、我没有离开家，只是把家带去了远方。

来源：方太母亲节的TVC广告

4、年轻时一切的误差都可以是天意，成年后一切天意都理解为误差。

来源：芒果TV的《向往的生活》

里面也有很多的人生金句，是值得去细细品味。

四、父亲是干部碑文经典范例？

父亲是干部，可以成为碑文经典的范例，要根据父亲的个人贡献和品行来描述。例如，可以写下父亲在工作中的辛勤付出、勇于担当的精神，以及为人正直、诚实守信的品质等。这些都是父亲作为干部所具备的闪光点，也是可以被刻在碑文上作为经典范例。同时，在描述父亲的时候，还可以展示他为人父的一面，例如如何悉心照顾家庭、呵护孩子等，这将更加丰富碑文的内涵，使之更具感人和可感知的价值。

五、报纸广告文案经典范例？

以下是一些经典的报纸广告文案范例，供您参考：

1. "品质卓越，享受无限。立即体验我们的豪华产品，让您的生活更加精彩！"

2. "限时特惠，错过再等一年。抓住机会，以超值价格购买您梦寐以求的商品！"

3. "解决您的问题，满足您的需求。我们为您提供高效、可靠的解决方案，让您的生活更轻松！"

4. "独一无二的体验，独特的风格。感受我们独具匠心的产品，成为与众不同的焦点！"

5. "品牌信誉，您的首选。多年来，我们一直赢得客户的信任和好评，成为您可靠的合作伙伴！"

6. "时尚潮流，尽在我们的门店。更新换代的时尚产品，让您成为时尚界的领先者！"

7. "健康与美丽，从我们开始。我们提供优质的健康美容产品，让您焕发青春活力！"

8. "为您省钱，为您省心。我们的产品不仅价格实惠，还能为您节省时间和精力！"

9. "全方位的服务，满足您的需求。我们的团队将竭诚为您提供个性化的专业服务！"

10. "独特的优势，无与伦比的价值。选择我们，您将获得超越期望的回报！"

这些广告文案范例都具有简洁明了、强调产品或服务的独特卖点、吸引读者兴趣等特点。当然，具体的广告文案要根据产品、目标受众和宣传目的来进行创作，以确保最佳的传播效果。

六、新婚来宾代表讲话经典范例？

尊敬的新郎新娘，各位来宾：

首先，我代表所有来宾，向新人表示最真挚的祝福和祝福。今天，您两位组成了一个幸福的家庭，让我们一起见证这一瞬间！

我还记得，当我第一次见到您们两个时，就被你们的爱情故事所打动。我可以看到，你们两个彼此关心和支持，相信在未来的人生旅程中，你们一定会一起经历每一个美好的瞬间。

此外，今天也是我们大家的喜事，我们可以一起分享这个美好的时刻。感谢你们的款待和热情，给我们留下了深刻的印象和回忆。

最后，让我们再一次为新郎新娘干杯，祝愿他们能够永远相爱，幸福美满。谢谢！

七、分析哲学有哪些范例式的经典文献？

下面是我觉得最经典的十篇文献（仅代表个人偏好）：

1. Frege, Gottlob. 1892: “On Sense and Reference” tr. by M. Black, in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, P. Geach and M. Black (eds.), Oxford: Blackwell, 3rd ed., 1980.
2. Russell, Bertrand. 1905: “On Denoting,” Mind 14: 479-93.
3. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, tr. C.K. Ogden. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4. Carnap, Rudolf. 1932: “The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language.” Erkenntnis: 60-81.
5. Ryle, Gilbert. 1949: The Concept of Mind, New York: Barnes and Noble.
6. Quine, W. V. 1951: “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Philosophical Review 60(1951): 20-43.
7. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953: Philosophical Investigations, tr. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Strawson, Peter. 1959: Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. Routledge.
9. Austin, J.L. 1962: Sense and Sensibilia, London: Oxford University Press.
10. Kripke, Saul. 1980: Naming and Necessity, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

其他的可以参考IEP“Analytic Philosophy”词条最后的references and further reading。

Primary Sources

• Moore, G. E. 1899: “The Nature of Judgment,” Mind 8, 176-93. Reprinted in Moore 1993, 1-19.
• Moore, G. E. 1903a: Principia Ethica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Moore, G. E. 1903b: “The Refutation of Idealism” Mind 12, 433-53. Reprinted in Moore 1993, 23-44.
• Moore, G. E. 1925: “A Defense of Common Sense” in J. H. Muirhead ed., Contemporary British Philosophy, London: Allen and Unwin, 193-223. Reprinted in Moore 1959, 126-148, and Moore 1993, 106-33.
• Moore, G. E. 1939: “Proof of an External World,” Proceedings of the British Academy 25, 273-300. Reprinted in Moore 1993, 147-70.
• Moore, G. E. 1942a: “An Autobiography,” in Schilpp ed., 1942, 3-39.
• Moore, G. E. 1942b: “A Reply to My Critics,” in Schilpp ed., 1942, 535-677.
• Moore, G. E. 1959: Philosophical Papers, London: George Allen and Unwin.
• Moore, G. E. 1993: G.E. Moore: Selected Writings, ed. Thomas Baldwin, London: Routledge.
• Russell, Bertrand. 1959: My Philosophical Development, London: George Allen and Unwin; New York: Simon and Schuster.

Secondary Sources

• Ayer, A.J. (ed ) 1971: Russell and Moore: The Analytical Heritage, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Baldwin, T. 1990: G. E. Moore, London: Routledge.
• Baldwin, T. 1991: “The Identity Theory of Truth,” Mind, New Series, Vol. 100, No. 1, 35-52.
• Bell, David. 1999: “The Revolution of Moore and Russell: A Very British Coup?” in Anthony O’Hear (ed.), German Philosophy Since Kant, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Griffin, Nicholas. 1991: Russell’s Idealist Apprenticeship, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Hylton, Peter. 1990: Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Schilpp, P.A., ed. 1942: The Philosophy of G.E. Moore, Library of Living Philosophers Vol. 4, La Salle: Open Court.

b. Russell and the Early Wittgenstein: Ideal Language and Logical Atomism

Primary Sources

• Frege, Gottlob. 1879: Concept Script, a formal language of pure thought modeled upon that of arithmetic, tr. by S. Bauer-Mengelberg, in J. van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967.
• Frege, Gottlob. 1892: “On Sense and Reference” tr. by M. Black, in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, P. Geach and M. Black (eds.), Oxford: Blackwell, 3rd ed., 1980.
• Russell, Bertrand. 1905: “On Denoting,” Mind 14: 479-93.
• Russell, Bertrand. 1908: “Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types,” American Journal of Mathematics, 30, 222-262. Reprinted in Russell 1956, 59-102.
• Russell, Bertrand. 1914: “On Scientific Method in Philosophy,” in Russell 1918, 97-124.
• Russell, Bertrand. 1918-19: “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism,” The Monist 28:495-527 and 29:33-63, 190-222, 344-80; reprinted La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1985.
• Russell, Bertrand. 1918: Mysticism and Logic: and Other Essays, New York: Longmans, Green and Co.
• Russell, Bertrand. 1944a: “My Mental Development,” in Schilpp, ed. 1944, 3-20.
• Russell, Bertrand. 1944b: “Reply to Criticisms,” in Schilpp, ed. 1944, 681-741.
• Russell, Bertrand. 1946: “The Philosophy of Logical Analysis,” from A History of Western Philosophy, London: Allen and Unwin; New York: Simon and Schuster, 1946; reprinted in Dennon and Egner, eds., 1961, pp. 301-307.
• Russell, Bertrand. 1950: “Is Mathematics Purely Linguistic?,” in Russell 1973, pp. 295-306.
• Russell, Bertrand. 1956: Logic and Knowledge, Robert Marsh, ed., London: Unwin Hyman Ltd.
• Russell, Bertrand. 1959: My Philosophical Development, London: Unwin.
• Russell, Bertrand. 1973: Essays in Analysis, Douglas lackey, ed., London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
• Russell, Bertrand, and Whitehead, Alfred North. 1910-1913: Principia Mathematica 3 vols. London: Cambridge University Press. Second edition 1925.
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, tr. C.K. Ogden. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Secondary Sources

• Kenny, Anthony. 2000: Frege: An Introduction to the Founder of Modern Analytic Philosophy, Blackwell Publishers.
• Baker, G .P. and Hacker, P.M.S. 1983: “Dummett’s Frege or Through a Looking-Glass Darkly,” Mind, 92, pp. 239-246.
• Baker, G .P. and Hacker, P.M.S. 1984: Frege: Logical Excavations, Oxford: Blackwell.
• Baker, G .P. and Hacker, P.M.S. 1987: “Dummett’s Dig: Looking-Glass Archaeology,” Philosophical Quarterly, 37, pp. 86-99.
• Baker, G .P. and Hacker, P.M.S. 1989: “The Last Ditch,” Philosophical Quarterly, 39, pp. 471-477.
• Dummett, Michael. 1991: Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics, London: Duckworth.
• Monk, Ray and Palmer, Anthony (eds.). 1996: Bertrand Russell and the Origins of Analytical Philosophy, Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
• Reck, Erich (ed.). 2001: From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early analytic philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Pears, D.F. 1967: Bertrand Russell and the British Tradition in Philosophy, London: Collins.
• Schilpp, P.A. 1944: The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Library of Living Philosophers Vol. 5, La Salle: Open Court.
• Schrenmann, R. (ed.) 1967: Bertrand Russell: Philosopher of the Century, London: Allen and Unwin.
• Tait, William (ed). 1997: Early Analytic Philosophy: Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein; Essays in Honor of Leonard Linsky, Chicago: Open Court.

c. Logical Positivism, the Vienna Circle, and Quine

Primary Sources

• Ayer, A.J. 1936: Language, Truth and Logic, London: Gollantz; second edition 1946; reprinted New York: Dover, 1952.
• Carnap, Rudolf. 1928: The Logical Structure of the World. English trans. published by Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.
• Carnap, Rudolf. 1934: “On the Character of Philosophical Problems,” tr. W.M. Malisoff, in Rorty (ed.) 1967, 54-62.
• Hempel, Carl. 1950: “Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4:41-63; reprinted in Ayer (ed.) 1959.
• Quine, W. V. “Truth by Convention.” In O.H. Lee (ed.), Philosophical Essays for A.N. Whitehead, New York: Longmans, 1936; reprinted in Ways of Paradox: New York: Random House, 1966.
• Quine, W. V. 1951: “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Philosophical Review 60(1951):20-43.
• Quine, W. V. Word and Object. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1960.
• Quine, W. V. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969.

Secondary Sources

• Ayer, A.J. (ed ) 1959: Logical Positivism, Westport: Greenwood Press, 1959.
• Schilpp, P.A. 1963: The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. 11, La Salle: Open Court.
• Schilpp, P.A. The Philosophy of W.V. Quine, Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. 18, La Salle: Open Court.
• Schilpp, P.A. 1992: The Philosophy of A. J. Ayer, Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. 21, La Salle: Open Court.
• Sarkar, Sahotra (ed.) 1996: Science and Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: Basic Works of Logical Empiricism, 6 vols., New York & London: Garland Publishing.

d. The Later Wittgenstein, et al.: Ordinary-Language Philosophy

Primary Sources

• Austin, J.L. 1962: How to Do Things with Words, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Austin, J.L. 1962: Sense and Sensibilia, London: Oxford University Press.
• Grice, Paul. 1989: Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
• Ryle, Gilbert. 1949: The Concept of Mind, New York: Barnes and Noble.
• Ryle, Gilbert. 1953: Dilemmas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Strawson, Peter. 1950: “On Referring” Mind, 59: 320-344.
• Strawson, Peter and Grice, H. P. 1956: “In Defense of a Dogma,” Philosophical Review, 65: 141-58; reprinted in Grice 1989.
• Wisdom, John. 1931: Interpretation and Analysis in Relation to Bentham’s Theory of Definition,London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner &Co.
• Wisdom, John. 1952: Other Minds, Oxford: Blackwell.
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953: Philosophical Investigations, tr. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.

Secondary Sources

• Canfield, J.V. (ed) 1986: The Philosophy of Wittgenstein, New York and London: Garland Publishing, Inc.
• Hacker, P.M.S. 1986: Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein, Oxford: Clarendon.
• Kripke, Saul. 1982: Wittgenstein On Rules and Private Language, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Urmson, J. O. 1956: Philosophical Analysis: Its Development Between the Two World Wars, London, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

e. The 1960s and After: The Era of Eclecticism

• Hacking, Ian, 1975: Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kripke, Saul. 1980: Naming and Necessity Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
• Mundle, C. W. K. 1970: A Critique of Linguistic Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Gellner, E. 1959: Words and Things: A Critical Account of Linguistic Philosophy and a Study in Ideology, London: Gollancz.

f. Critical and Historical Accounts of Analytic Philosophy

• Ayer, A. J., et al. 1963: The Revolution in Philosophy, London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd.
• Ayer, A.J. (ed ) 1982: Philosophy in the Twentieth Century, London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.
• Beaney, Michael. 2003: “Analysis,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL= < http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/analysis/>.
• Biletzki and Matar (eds.). 1998: The Story of Analytic Philosophy: Plot and Heroes, London and New York: Routledge.
• Capaldi, Nicholas. 2000: The Enlightenment Project in the Analytic Conversation, Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Charlton, William. 1991: The Analytic Ambition: An Introduction to Philosophy, Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.
• Clarke, D.S. 1997: Philosophy’s Second Revolution: Early and Recent Analytic Philosophy, La Salle: Open Court.
• Coffa, J.A. 1991: The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Cohen, L. J. 1986: The Dialogue of Reason: An Analysis of Analytical Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Collingwood, R.G. An Essay on Philosophical Method
• Corrado, Michael. 1975: The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy: Background and Issues, Chicago: American Library Association.
• Dummett, Michael. 1993: Origins of Analytical Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Garber, Daniel. 2004: “Philosophy and the Scientific Revolution,” in Teaching New Histories of Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Center for Human Values.
• Glock, Hans-Johann (ed.). 1997: The Rise of Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
• Grafton, Anthony. 2004: “A Note from Inside the Teapot,” in Teaching New Histories of Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Center for Human Values.
• Hanna, Robert. 2001: Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Mehta, Ved. 1961: Fly and the Fly Bottle: Encounters with British Intellectuals, New York: Columbia University Press.
• Nagel, Ernest. 1936a-b: “Impressions and Appraisals of Analytic Philosophy in Europe,” The Journal of Philosophy vol. 33, no. 1, 5-24 and no. 2, 29-53.
• Pap, Arthur. 1949: Elements of Analytic Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.
• Preston, Aaron. 2004: “Prolegomena to Any Future History of Analytic Philosophy,” Metaphilosophy, vol. 35, no. 4, 445-465.
• Preston, Aaron. 2005a: “Conformism in Analytic Philosophy: On Shaping Philosophical Boundaries and Prejudices,” The Monist, Volume 88, Number 2, April 2005.
• Preston, Aaron. 2005b: “Implications of Recent Work on Analytic Philosophy,” The Bertrand Russell Society Quarterly, no. 127 (August 2005), 11-30.
• Prosch, Harry. 1964: The Genesis of Twentieth Century Philosophy: The Evolution of Thought from Copernicus to the Present, Garden City: Doubleday and Co., Inc.
• Soames, Scott. 2003. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, 2 vols., Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Stroll, Avrum. 2000: Twentieth Century Analytic Philosophy, New York: Columbia University Press.
• Warnock, G.J. 1958: English Philosophy Since 1900, London: Oxford University Press.

g. Anthologies and General Introductions

• Ammerman, Robert (ed.). 1990: Classics of Analytic Philosophy, Indianapolis: Hackett.
• Baillie, James (ed.). 2002: Contemporary Analytic Philosophy: Core Readings, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall.
• Martinich, A. P. and Sosa, David (eds.). 2001a: Analytic Philosophy: An Anthology, Blackwell Publishers.
• Martinich, A. P. and Sosa, David (eds.). 2001b: A Companion to Analytic Philosophy, Blackwell Publishers.
• Rorty, Richard (ed.). 1992: The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

题主还提到了“范例式的期刊”。期刊排名可以参考：

八、教师父亲碑文经典范例？

进入黉门廿五年， 释疑解惑记心间。

以德为本何曾忘， 重教兴邦未敢闲。

笃信好学求自在， 修身守正励清廉。

杏坛非是逍遥地， 桃李无言在尊前。

九、业主投诉物业经典范例？

案例：2004年5月，陈某与某物业公司签订了入住协议书。某日，陈某晚上下班后将自己的摩托车未加防盗装置就停放在了小区内，等第二天上班时，陈某发现自己的摩托车已不在停放点了，便立即报了警，但至今未破案。今年10月，陈某起诉至法院，请求法院判令物业公司赔偿摩托车的损失。 

分析：陈某在入住后，与物业公司签订了入住协议书，该合同是物业公司对陈某提供物业管理服务的承诺和陈某愿意接受服务和物业管理的明确表示。双方并未就陈某的财产由物业公司保管签订过保管合同或有其他约定，物业公司无保管陈某摩托车的义务。尽管物业公司对小区的安全负有日常管理的义务，但其所承担的小区安全防范的义务只是协助义务。

点评：当前，业主与物业公司的纠纷不少已经开始转移到家庭财产的失窃方面。由于业主家里的财产被盗事件经常发生，于是许多业主片面理解物业公司就是小区的“第二警力”，一旦自己家庭财产遭遇损失动辄就将物业公司推上被告席，然而这并不代表物业公司必须承担业主失窃的后果。

十、父母碑文四言经典范例？

父母碑文四言范例：养育之恩，世代铭记！

此四言范例在碑文中很常用，而且含义深广，通俗易懂，是经典挽联范例。其合义为：父母养育深情，比天高，比地大，比海深，子子孙孙当铭记恩情，不能忘记！更是教育子女后代对待父母要感恩，也是对子孙后代做出表率。